Friday, March 29, 2024
News

'Can consider improving...': SC on cumbersome guidelines on living will

   SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend    Print this Page   COMMENT

New Delhi | Wednesday, 2023 10:45:09 AM IST
The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that the legislature should enact a law for terminally ill patients who decide to stop medical treatment.

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Justice K.M. Joseph agreed to modify its 2018 guidelines on "living will", an advance medical directive on end of life treatment. The bench, also comprising Justices Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy, and C. T. Ravikumar, said only guidelines can be tweaked otherwise it will become a review of its 2018 judgment.

"We are only here to consider improving the guidelines. We should realise the limitations of the court also," it said.

The top court further added that the legislature has more skills and sources of knowledge and the court is not an expert in medicine, therefore it has to be careful.

It was considering a plea seeking modification of the guidelines for living will/advance medical directive issued by it in 2018.

The bench said the advance directive can be applied only in some cases, where terminally ill patients are not in a position to say that the treatment must stop.

Senior advocate Arvind P. Datar, representing The Indian Society for Critical Care, contended that due to the involvement of multiple stakeholders, the procedure under the apex court guidelines has become unworkable.

Additional Solicitor General K.M. Nataraj submitted that few meetings were held with AIIMS representatives and other stakeholders and a chart of necessary safeguards has been prepared. Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing NGO Common Cause, submitted that everybody has an indefeasible right to refuse treatment.

The top court was informed that first a medical board would have to declare that the patient has no scope of recovery, then the District Collector would have to set up an independent medical board to obtain a second opinion, and after this, the matter would be referred to a judicial magistrate.

Datar argued that the role of the judicial magistrate can be kept out and recommended that in a living will, there can be two witnesses as he emphasised that the execution of the living will is very cumbersome. The hearing in the matter will continue on Wednesday.

In 2018, a top court judgment had recognised that a person in a persistent vegetative state may execute an advance medical directive or a "living will" to refuse medical treatment.

--IANS ss/vd

( 399 Words)

2023-01-17-19:14:04 (IANS)

 
  LATEST COMMENTS ()
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments Not Available
 
POST YOUR COMMENT
 
 
TRENDING TOPICS
 
 
CITY NEWS
MORE CITIES
 
 
 
MORE HEALTH NEWS
Study finds how childhood sedentariness ...
Longer genes are associated with ageing...
Dr. Dangs Lab aims to revolutionise heal...
Researchers find ways to reduce side eff...
Study gives insight into role of specifi...
Collaborative study between bariatric, t...
More...
 
INDIA WORLD ASIA
BJP's Ravi Shankar Prasad backs letter b...
PM engages in candid chat with Bill Gate...
'We need to establish some Dos and don't...
ASI continues survey at Bhojshala Comple...
Ten dead as taxi rolls down gorge on Jam...
'Was unwell, not being given treatment,'...
More...    
 
 Top Stories
"Honoured to be nominated for Upcom... 
Rahul Gandhi promises 50 pc reserva... 
Punjab police bust criminal network... 
Defence secy Giridhar Aramane inaug... 
Nippon Group's Sahiba Oils Makes Wa... 
Inorbit Mall and Making The Differe... 
Nick Jonas gets new haircut by Tige... 
ED attaches flat worth Rs 86.18 lak...