SC dismisses plea challenging E20 petrol policy

A bench of Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran declined to entertain the plea filed by advocate Akshay Malhotra.

Attorney General for India R. Venkataramani opposed the petition, stating that everything had been considered before the rollout of the policy.

The petitioner was only a "name-lender" and there was a huge lobby, said the Attorney General.

He further said that the policy was benefiting India's sugarcane farmers and was saving foreign exchange.

"Will people outside the country dictate what kind of fuel India should use?" asked AG.

Senior advocate Shadan Farasat, appearing for the petitioner, said that now only E20 is seemingly available without any notice, and people should be given the option of what they want.

He referred to a 2021 NITI Ayog Report, which he said expressed concerns about the impact of older vehicles which are not compliant with E20.

He said only vehicles which are manufactured after April 2023 are compliant with E20 petrol.

"We were not against Ethanol-blending, but were only seeking an option of Ethanol-free petrol for vehicles manufactured prior to 2023, which are not compatible with E20," the advocate further added.

The plea alleged that millions of motorists have been forced to use fuel not designed for their vehicles.

It has sought a direction from the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas to ensure the availability of ethanol-free petrol at all fuel stations.

The plea further sought direction to the authorities to mandatorily label ethanol content on all petrol pumps and dispensing units, making it clearly visible to consumers, and also to ensure that consumers were informed about the ethanol compatibility of their vehicles at the time of fuel dispensing.

Cars and two-wheelers manufactured before 2023, as well as some newer BS-VI models, are not compatible with such high ethanol blends, it said. (ANI)