Tuesday, January 27, 2026
News

Delhi HC dismisses Janata Party's plea challenging constitutionality of election symbols order

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend    Print this Page   COMMENT

New Delhi | January 17, 2025 9:42:42 PM IST
The Delhi High Court on Friday dismissed a petition challenging the Election Symbols (Reservation & Allotment) Order of 1968, which sought to have it declared 'unconstitutional' and ultra vires the Constitution.

The petition, filed by the Janata Party stated that the order was 'discriminatory', as it contended that symbols allotted to registered political parties are inseparable from the party, serving as a key part of its identity and public recognition.

The petition further claimed that the classification and denial of symbols to unregistered parties was unreasonable, unjust, and unnatural, warranting the order's quashing.

The bench, headed by Acting Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru, dismissed the plea, noting that the issue had already been addressed by the Supreme Court.

Advocate Siddhant Kumar, representing the Election Commission of India (ECI), argued that the issue raised had already been addressed in multiple court decisions.

The bench, while passing its order, agreed with ECI's contention, stating that the matter had been conclusively settled by authoritative Supreme Court rulings. The court referred to the case SS v ECI, reiterating that political parties cannot claim symbols as their exclusive property, and that the Election Symbols Order clearly allows for the loss of a symbol in the event of poor electoral performance. Consequently, the petition challenging the constitutionality of the order was rejected, said the bench.

The petition argued that as a national party (Janta Party), it had been allotted the symbol of a plough on the shoulder of a farmer. However, this symbol was now denied to the party, which had been reclassified as a registered unrecognised party. The petitioner contended that it was being forced to contest elections without its original symbol and instead had to choose from a list of available free symbols.

The petitioner argued that the classification of political parties as "registered and recognised" versus "registered and unrecognised" is baseless, unreasonable, and contradictory. It questioned how a party that is registered can be labeled as unrecognised.

Furthermore, the petitioner contended that the symbol, which is central to the party's identity and essence, was unjustly denied and taken away after the party was reclassified as a registered unrecognised political party. (ANI)

 
  LATEST COMMENTS (0)
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments Not Available
 
POST YOUR COMMENT
 
 
TRENDING TOPICS
 
 
CITY NEWS
MORE CITIES
 
 
INDIA WORLD ASIA
'Congress has been against Northeast': B...
Trying to divide people through UGC: UP ...
'EC, BJP conducting NRC in garb of SIR':...
Gujarat ATS, Navsari Police book UP man ...
MP: Power supply agreements signed for 4...
Ayodhya GST Commissioner 'deeply hurt' o...
More...    
 
 Top Stories
Piyush Goyal hopes India-EU FTA wil... 
"Expecting rightful share from Unio... 
BJP organises Dharna at Hyderabad's... 
Northeast India's handlooms, handic... 
J-K: Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinh... 
MGNREGA, Special Intensive Revision... 
2026 Election Manifesto will be 'He... 
"India-EU Business Forum great plat...