Sunday, January 4, 2026
News

Delhi HC issues notice to NIA in bail plea of ISIS operative Ammar Abdul Rahiman

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend    Print this Page   COMMENT

New Delhi | January 29, 2024 3:54:30 PM IST
The Delhi High Court on Monday issued notice to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in a bail plea of Ammar Abdul Rahiman, an alleged ISIS operative.

He has challenged the trial court order refusing him bail in an NIA case of 2021.

The division bench headed by Justice Suresh Kumar Kait issued a notice to NIA and directed them to file a reply. The next date for hearing is March 12, 2024.

Advocate Archit Krishna, counsel for Rahiman, submitted that the petitioner has challenged the order of the trial court denying bail to him.

He also submitted that the charges have been framed against him under Section 2 (o) read with 13 along with Sections 38 and 39 of the UAPA. He has been in custody for over two years now.

His bail application was dismissed by the trial court.

Earlier, on October 31, 2022, the accused, Ammar Abdul Rahiman, along with other accused persons was charged under Section 120B of the IPC, read with Section 2(o), read with Section 13, along with Sections 38 and 39 of the UA(P) Act.

The NIA had initially filed a chargesheet against the three accused persons, namely Mohammad Ameen Kathodi alias Abu Yahya, Mushab Anwar alias Ibnanwar and Rhees Rasheed alias Sachu, on September 8, 2022.

After further investigations, a supplementary charge sheet has been filed against eight accused persons, namely Mundadiguttu Sadanananda Marla Deepthi alias Deepthi Marla alias Maryam, Mohd. Waqar Lone alias Wilson Kashmiri, Mizha Siddeeque, Shifa Haris, Obaid Hamid Matta, Madesh Shanker alias Abdulla alias Dardan, Ammar Abdul Rahiman and Muzamil Hassan Bhat while accused Irshad Thekke Koleth alias Bilai, is alleged to have absconded to a foreign country.

The accused persons were charge-sheeted for the offence punishable under Sections 120B and 121A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 17, 18, 18B, 20, 38, 39 and 40 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.

While framing charges against the eight accused, the court said that prima facie grounds to hold that the accused had been operating various social media platforms as a toolkit for spreading the ISIS ideology and thereby allure, impress and radicalise like-minded fellow persons to inter alia indulging in unlawful activities. (ANI)

 
  LATEST COMMENTS (0)
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments Not Available
 
POST YOUR COMMENT
 
 
TRENDING TOPICS
 
 
CITY NEWS
MORE CITIES
 
 
INDIA WORLD ASIA
Mahayuti has shut down all businesses of...
Fire breaks out at parking area of Thris...
'TMC leaders losing temperament, confide...
Change in district boundaries is another...
'Using lingualism, provincialism, appeas...
256 Naxals killed, over 1,500 surrendere...
More...    
 
 Top Stories
Venezuela Supreme Court names Delcy... 
'One Battle After Another' wins Bes... 
"US' modus operandi spectacular, bu... 
"It's kind of a great honour...": E... 
Socialism, oil, narco-terrorism: Wh... 
"Law of the jungle prevails": Tharo... 
Indian equity markets poised for co... 
After Maduro capture Zelenskyy make...