Wednesday, January 7, 2026
News

Adani-Hindenburg row: SC to pronounce its verdict on January 3

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend    Print this Page   COMMENT

New Delhi | January 2, 2024 10:21:30 PM IST
The Supreme Court on Wednesday will pronounce its judgement on a batch of petitions seeking a court-monitored investigation into the allegations made by US-based firm Hindenburg Research against the Adani group of companies regarding violations of the stock market.

A bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra reserved its verdict on the order on various aspects related to the Hindenburg report in November 2023.

The case is related to the allegations (part of a report by short-seller Hindenberg Research) that Adani had inflated its share prices. After these allegations were published, it led to a sharp fall in the share value of various Adani companies, reportedly to the tune of $100 billion.

The Adani Group has dismissed the charges as lies, saying it complies with all laws and disclosure requirements.

Various petitions were filed alleging that changes to the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act (SEBI Act) had provided a shield and an excuse for the Adani Group's regulatory contraventions and market manipulations to remain undetected.

The apex court then asked SEBI to independently probe the matter and also constituted an expert committee headed by retired Supreme Court judge Justice AM Sapre to look into the matter.

In May last year, the expert committee in its report had found no prima facie lapse on the part of the SEBI in the matter.

While reserving the verdict, the Supreme Court had said it has no reason to "discredit" SEBI, which probed allegations against the Adani group, as there was no material before it to doubt what the market regulator has done and the court does not have to treat what was set out in the Hindenburg report as a "true state of affairs".

It had observed that it cannot ask a statutory regulator to take as a "gospel truth" something which was published in the media.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for one of the petitioners, had told the apex court that there were many factual revelations in the Hindenburg report.

He said it was for the top court to see whether the investigation done by the SEBI was credible or not and whether some other independent organisation or an SIT needed to be formed to investigate it. (ANI)

 
  LATEST COMMENTS (0)
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments Not Available
 
POST YOUR COMMENT
 
 
TRENDING TOPICS
 
 
CITY NEWS
MORE CITIES
 
 
INDIA WORLD ASIA
'Seems to be a prank mail; will conduct ...
BJP gets scared the moment Trump's name ...
'Offspring of Sharjeel Imam were born at...
I-B Ministry's WaveX signs MoU with FITT...
'Did not surrender because of encounters...
Maharashtra CM Fadnavis holds rally in J...
More...    
 
 Top Stories
Ukraine Prez meets Witkoff, Kushner... 
Paris meeting of 'Coalition of Will... 
"Acquiring Greenland a US national ... 
"Offspring of Sharjeel Imam were bo... 
'Crisis would have happened under T... 
Delhi HC declines bail to woman who... 
'Can confidently predict 2026 will ... 
3.6 magnitude earthquake hits Afgha...