Friday, September 25, 2026
News

SC adjourns hearing on 'Media One' plea

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend    Print this Page   COMMENT

New Delhi | April 7, 2022 8:52:50 PM IST
The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted more time to the Centre to file a reply to 'Media One' plea challenging the Kerala High Court order which upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of the news channel.

A Bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud listed the matter for further hearing on May 4.

The Court also extended its interim relief to Media One by staying the Central Government's decision banning the Malayalam news channel and allowed it to resume broadcasting.

Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the petitioner, had told the Court earlier that many people are losing their jobs and no media channel will be safe in the country if such practice is allowed.

The Supreme Court was hearing the Media One plea challenging the Kerala High Court order which upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of the news channel.

In the Special Leave Petition by Media One, through advocate Pallavi Pratap, the channel said that it has filed the petition under dire and compelling circumstances.

The petition also said that it raises seminal questions of law impinging upon the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression as well as the importance of an independent, free and unbiased press guaranteed by the Constitution.

The Kerala High Court on February 8, 2022 upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of Media One from the list of permitted news channels citing security reasons.

The Court dismissed petitions filed by the channel against the government order.

While dismissing the writ petition challenging the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, the Kerala High Court made it clear that principles of natural justice and interference by Court in cases of national security have a very limited role.

Rejecting the pleas of the petitioner to keep the judgment in abeyance for two days, the Court replied, "I cannot extend it even for an hour."

The Single Bench of Justice N Nagaresh further observed in the order that "national security is considered as one of the most important sovereign functions for long." (ANI)

 
  LATEST COMMENTS (0)
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments Not Available
 
POST YOUR COMMENT
 
 
TRENDING TOPICS
 
 
CITY NEWS
MORE CITIES
 
 
INDIA WORLD ASIA
Delhi HC denies anticipatory bail to You...
Leave encashment is part of retiral due...
'Who was filming the reels?': Bihar Mini...
Gr Noida bus fire: Vehicle had 9 challan...
Punjab govt waives power bills worth ove...
ED arrests two persons in Rs 146 crore a...
More...    
 
 Top Stories
CISF apprehends alleged serial frau... 
Netanyahu arrives in US; set to add... 
Alia Bhatt, Ranbir Kapoor turn head... 
"Diabolic game to subvert democracy... 
"Strategically planned...": Govinda... 
Indo-Africa roundtable on WASH held... 
North East Delhi Riots 2020: Court ... 
Kashmiri Activist Beigh raises alar...