Academy members critisize Oscars' live telecast decision

According to The Hollywood Reporter, the decision was described as "insulting" by numerous Academy members who spoke with the outlet following the announcement.

The Academy plans to present Oscars in eight categories, documentary short, film editing, makeup/hairstyling, original score, production design, animated short, live-action short and sound, inside the Dolby Theatre an hour before the live telecast commences. They will be recorded and edited into the subsequent live broadcast.

Nominees in the affected categories were informed of the approach to the presentation via a town hall-style meeting on Tuesday afternoon, shortly before the official announcement from the Academy, according to one source. Despite the decision to change the presentation, members were told a three-hour show is still planned, the source said.

Whether all guests will be seated in the theatre or still on the red carpet for this earlier presentation wasn't clear, according to the source. "It's complete fiasco. It's another example of the Academy bowing to the network. There are a lot of very unhappy people," said one affected Academy member of the decision. Another added, "I am offended and insulted by the Academy's decision to relegate eight categories to an inferior position at the awards this year. ... It's absurd and the leadership should be ashamed."

In 2019, the Academy had announced plans to present four categories during commercial breaks followed by taped replays later in the show but reversed the decision amid criticism. By Tuesday evening, some Academy members had started to reach out to directors, producers and studio executives seeking help in reversing this latest plan.

Numerous associations additionally released statements. The American Cinema Editors board of directors said: "We are deeply disappointed by the Academy's decision to alter the way certain categories, including film editing, will be presented in the Oscars telecast. It sends a message that some creative disciplines are more vital than others. Nothing could be further from the truth and all who make movies know this."

They continued, "As a group of artists wholly dedicated to advancing the art and prestige of film editing, we passionately believe that editing, and all other creative disciplines that are part of the collaborative art of filmmaking, should be treated equally. Our contributions to that collaboration may sometimes appear invisible but they are undeniable. We hope that film editors and other artists affected by this change will be honoured and celebrated with the passion, dignity and inclusion they deserve."

Mark A. Lanza, president of Motion Picture Sound Editors, agreed: "The Academy's mission is to honour the craft of filmmaking in all its parts. Eliminating certain categories from the live broadcast degrades that mission."

He also pointed to the "bill of goods the sound branch was sold" when, beginning with the 2021 Oscars, there was a change to a single best sound category.

"The Academy made an explicit promise not to eliminate sound from the live broadcast if they agreed to the travesty of combining sound editing and sound mixing into one category," he said.

The International Cinematographers Guild (IATSE Local 600) additionally released a statement, which read in part, "We are so proud of our members whose work will be honoured during the Academy Awards show this year. We are, however, disappointed by the Academy's decision to exclude so many exceptional artists in other branches from the live broadcast itself. Cinematographers and all filmmakers understand the collaboration required to produce ineligible images."

But not all reacted in the same way. "We support the Academy's commitment to identify all nominees on-air and feature all winners' acceptance speeches on the live broadcast," said Nelson Coates, president of the Art Directors Guild (IATSE Local 800), in a statement provided to The Hollywood Reporter. (ANI)