Sunday, November 15, 2026
News

Man pictured as baby on Nirvana's 'Nevermind' album cover refiles lawsuit

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend    Print this Page   COMMENT

Washington | January 14, 2022 5:20:20 PM IST
Spencer Elden, the man whose baby picture was used on the album cover for Nirvana's 'Nevermind', has refiled a lawsuit alleging the cover image was taken and used without his consent and the nudity amounts to child pornography.

According to Variety, a judge dismissed the lawsuit on January 3 due to missed deadlines, but Elden and his representation were given 10 days to amend the complaint and refile it. The lawsuit was refiled on January 13 in Los Angeles federal court.

The refiled lawsuit has once again named Nirvana band members Dave Grohl and Krist Novoselic, as well as Kurt Cobain's widow Courtney Love (the executor of Cobain's estate), as defendants, along with photographer Kirk Weddle, Nirvana L.L.C., Universal Music Group, UMG Recordings, MCA Records and The David Geffen Company.

The lawsuit alleges that in the "10 years preceding the filing of this action each Defendant knowingly possessed, transported, reproduced, advertised, promoted, presented, distributed, provided and/or obtained child pornography depicting Spencer, who had not attained the age of 18 years when this image was printed on the cover of Nirvana's 'Nevermind' album."

"As a result of the above actions, Spencer has suffered damages during the 10 years preceding the filing of this action, and he will continue to suffer damages as long as the violations described above persist," the lawsuit adds.

It continues, "During the 10 years preceding the filing of this action, each defendant intentionally commercially marketed the child pornography depicting Spencer and leveraged the lascivious nature of his image to promote the 'Nevermind album, the band, and Nirvana's music, while earning, at a minimum tens of millions of dollars in the aggregate."

As per Variety, had Elden not refiled the lawsuit by January 13, the judge would've dismissed it "without prejudice." The judge at the time also ordered that, should the defendants wish to apply for another motion to dismiss to the refiled suit, then "counsel for the parties shall, on January 20, 2022, at 10:00 am, meet and confer in person or via video conference to discuss defendants' motion to dismiss." (ANI)

 
  LATEST COMMENTS ()
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments Not Available
 
POST YOUR COMMENT
 
 
TRENDING TOPICS
 
 
CITY NEWS
MORE CITIES
 
 
 
MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS
Matt Damon reveals Christopher Nolan's n...
Chhath Puja 2026: Delhis Geeta Colony m...
Malini Awasthi extends Chhath Puja wishe...
Veteran Telegu actor Giri Babu dies aged...
Aaron Pierre-starrer 'Fairytale in New Y...
Koffee with Karan 9: Ananya Panday gets ...
More...
 
INDIA WORLD ASIA
'We will not give up our rights': Congre...
PM Narendra Modi to visit UP on November...
'Congress, Rahul Gandhi has to give answ...
'They shout, they scream, they don't lis...
Phone tapping is not new for Modi; he wa...
'People are leaving them one by one': Sa...
More...    
 
 Top Stories
South Africa announces playing XI f... 
Commander of Belgian Navy RAdm Tang... 
"Congratulations to our young champ... 
"Palat Diya Akhilesh": Owaisi turns... 
Devotion, cultural traditions and c... 
US openly "threatening to starve Ir... 
Pollard looks in mirror for coachin... 
Delhi govt makes arrangements at ov...