Sunday, January 23, 2022
News

Man pictured as baby on Nirvana's 'Nevermind' album cover refiles lawsuit

   SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend    Print this Page   COMMENT

Washington | January 14, 2022 5:20:20 PM IST
Spencer Elden, the man whose baby picture was used on the album cover for Nirvana's 'Nevermind', has refiled a lawsuit alleging the cover image was taken and used without his consent and the nudity amounts to child pornography.

According to Variety, a judge dismissed the lawsuit on January 3 due to missed deadlines, but Elden and his representation were given 10 days to amend the complaint and refile it. The lawsuit was refiled on January 13 in Los Angeles federal court.

The refiled lawsuit has once again named Nirvana band members Dave Grohl and Krist Novoselic, as well as Kurt Cobain's widow Courtney Love (the executor of Cobain's estate), as defendants, along with photographer Kirk Weddle, Nirvana L.L.C., Universal Music Group, UMG Recordings, MCA Records and The David Geffen Company.

The lawsuit alleges that in the "10 years preceding the filing of this action each Defendant knowingly possessed, transported, reproduced, advertised, promoted, presented, distributed, provided and/or obtained child pornography depicting Spencer, who had not attained the age of 18 years when this image was printed on the cover of Nirvana's 'Nevermind' album."

"As a result of the above actions, Spencer has suffered damages during the 10 years preceding the filing of this action, and he will continue to suffer damages as long as the violations described above persist," the lawsuit adds.

It continues, "During the 10 years preceding the filing of this action, each defendant intentionally commercially marketed the child pornography depicting Spencer and leveraged the lascivious nature of his image to promote the 'Nevermind album, the band, and Nirvana's music, while earning, at a minimum tens of millions of dollars in the aggregate."

As per Variety, had Elden not refiled the lawsuit by January 13, the judge would've dismissed it "without prejudice." The judge at the time also ordered that, should the defendants wish to apply for another motion to dismiss to the refiled suit, then "counsel for the parties shall, on January 20, 2022, at 10:00 am, meet and confer in person or via video conference to discuss defendants' motion to dismiss." (ANI)

 
  LATEST COMMENTS ()
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments Not Available
 
POST YOUR COMMENT
 
 
TRENDING TOPICS
 
 
CITY NEWS
MORE CITIES
 
 
 
MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS
'America's Funniest Home Videos' to pay ...
Lata Mangeshkar's health is improving...
Julian McMahon is exiting 'FBI: Most Wan...
Julia Fox clarifies she's not dating Kan...
Regina King's son Ian Alexander Jr. dies...
For Saqib Saleem, performing in 'Unpause...
More...
 
INDIA WORLD ASIA
Dharma Sansad case: Plea in SC seeks SIT...
Vinod Rai being rewarded for maligning U...
Jharkhand reports 1,755 new COVID-19 cas...
Lewd remarks against women: 6 part of Cl...
Rising IED attacks in J&K keeping securi...
People's confidence in BJP has gone up i...
More...    
 
 Top Stories
2017 actress assault case: Actor Di... 
Nine hamster samples test positive ... 
Mizoram reports 1,285 new COVID-19 ... 
Late-life exercise shows rejuvenati... 
Over 161.47 cr COVID-19 vaccine dos... 
Australian Open: Sania Mirza, Rajee... 
Mulayam Singh Yadav, Jaya Bachchan ... 
Assembly polls: BJP's Manipur core ...