Saturday, December 20, 2025
News

Supreme court to hear pleas against arrest of Newsclick founder and HR head on October 19

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend    Print this Page   COMMENT

New Delhi | October 18, 2023 2:46:59 PM IST
The Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing for October 19 on the pleas filed by Newsclick founder and Editor-in-Chief Prabir Purkayastha and the website's human resources head, Amit Chakraborty.

The two individuals are challenging their arrest and detention under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), which is related to alleged Chinese funding to promote anti-national propaganda.

A bench comprising Justices BR Gavai and PK Mishra adjourned the matter to the following day. Justice Gavai mentioned that his fellow judge, Justice Mishra, also wishes to read the case files.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the petitioners, requested the bench to at least issue notice to the Delhi police. In response, the bench said it will hear the matter on the next day.

Prabir Purkayastha and Amit Chakraborty have filed petitions with the Supreme Court to challenge the Delhi High Court's decision to uphold the trial court's order that placed them in police custody. Subsequently, they were remanded to judicial custody.

Their arrest occurred on October 3, following an investigation by the Special Cell of the Delhi Police that involved the search of 30 locations related to the online news portal and its journalists.

The arrest was made under the UAPA based on allegations of receiving funds for promoting pro-China propaganda.

The FIR stated that a substantial amount of money had allegedly come from China to Newsclick to "disrupt the sovereignty of India" and foster disaffection against the country.

The investigative agency also claimed that Prabir Purkayastha had conspired with a group called the People's Alliance for Democracy and Secularism (PADS) to undermine the electoral process during the 2019 Lok Sabha polls.

The Delhi High Court had previously rejected their pleas, stating that it believed "serious offences affecting the stability, integrity, sovereignty, and national security have been alleged against the petitioner."

As a result, the court was not inclined to pass any favourable orders in their favour. (ANI)

 
  LATEST COMMENTS (0)
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments Not Available
 
POST YOUR COMMENT
 
 
TRENDING TOPICS
 
 
CITY NEWS
MORE CITIES
 
 
 
MORE BUSINESS NEWS
IndiaRF Acquires Majority Stake in Shree...
Elan Group Signs Levo Spalon to Offer Re...
RBI Governor considered benign inflation...
Hero Motors sign MoU with KPIT Technolog...
Odisha hosts 2-day regional AI summit, f...
Influencer Act Triumphs at the 10th Edit...
More...
 
INDIA WORLD ASIA
'We all respect Lord Ram': TMC's Kunal G...
PM Modi congratulates Nitin Nabin, expre...
JK CM meets Union Jal Shakti Minister CR...
Thick smog engulfs Delhi as air quality ...
BRS, BJP slam Congress over T'gana Panch...
Uttarakhand: CM Dhami urges devotees to ...
More...    
 
 Top Stories
IndiaRF Acquires Majority Stake in ... 
Srirangam's Vaikunta Ekadasi festiv... 
IndiGo warns of flight disruptions ... 
Ranchi soaks in the festive spirit ... 
CPRG hosts dialogue on India's chan... 
PM Modi's connect with Putin, Zelen... 
Inqilab leader Osman Hadi to be bur... 
Hardik Pandya checks on cameraman, ...