Saturday, July 22, 2017
News

Researchers warn against betting on deployment of carbon removal technologies

   SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend    Print this Page   COMMENT

San Francisco | Friday, 2017 11:15:04 AM IST
 
Two researchers from the Stanford University on Friday warned against betting the future of the planet on massive-scale deployment of carbon removal technologies.

"For any temperature limit, we've got a finite budget of how much heat-trapping gases we can put into the atmosphere. Relying on deployments of carbon removal technologies is like eating lots of dessert today, with great hopes for liposuction tomorrow," Xinhua news agency quoted Chris Field, a professor of biology and Earth system science and director of the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, as saying.

Field and Katharine Mach, senior research scientists at the Stanford's School of Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences, wrote in journal Science about the potential solution being widely discussed for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, also known as "negative emissions".

With the current pace of renewable energy deployment and emissions reductions efforts, the world is unlikely to achieve the Paris Climate Agreement's goal of limiting global warming to two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

This trend puts in doubt efforts to keep climate change damages from sea level rise, heat waves, drought and flooding in check.

While some strategies for carbon dioxide removal are well understood, such as planting trees that will store carbon from the atmosphere, others involve immature, little tested technologies, such as bioenergy with carbon capture and storage.

In that strategy, carbon dioxide produced from biomass energy is stored deep underground. In another technology called direct air capture, chemical processes extract carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

"The models generating possible trajectories of climate change mitigation bet on planetary-scale carbon removal in the second half of the century," Mach said. "For policymakers trying to limit the worst damages from climate change, that bet is reckless."

Arguing that there are important near-term opportunities for carbon removal at modest scale, often with other benefits for nature and people, and critical needs now for developing the technologies of the future, the researchers said heavy reliance on biomass energy with carbon capture and storage could require tremendous land areas.

The researchers support a balanced approach that includes research and development of carbon removal technologies but also makes use of available means to limit and reduce carbon emissions, such as investing in renewable energy sources.

--IANS py/

( 387 Words)

2017-05-19-10:54:09 (IANS)

Watch News Videos

 
  LATEST COMMENTS (0)
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments Not Available
 
POST YOUR COMMENT
 
TRENDING TOPICS
 
 
 
CITY NEWS
MORE CITIES
 
MORE SCIENCE NEWS
UC-Berkeley to receive funds for gene ed...
Now, a 'soft' robot that 'grows' like vi...
Spanish authorities exhume remains of Da...
NASA eyes solar eclipse to understand Ea...
When Mars got photobombed by its moon Ph...
Hubble captures tiny Martian moon Phobos...
More...
 
INDIA WORLD ASIA
Train services resume in Kashmir...
1,180 pilgrims leave for Amarnath...
CBI books Delhi firm for providing fake ...
Modi Govt. visibly 'helpless' in solving...
Mamata Govt. knows there is no case agai...
BJP corners Congress over Ambika Soni, V...
More...    
 
 Top Stories
Rain ends dry spell in UP's Braj ar... 
Actively working towards clean poli... 
Don't think I'm a feature film dire... 
Rush-hour pollution may be more har... 
Mithali Raj's father confident that... 
India was funded by invisible money... 
Dowry death: Women burnt alive in E... 
Amarnath pilgrimage progressing smo...