Thursday, April 9, 2020
News

'Kashmir only acceded, never merged into Indian dominion'

   SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend    Print this Page   COMMENT

New Delhi | Thursday, 2020 2:45:06 AM IST
Kashmir had only acceded and it was not merged into the Dominion of India, a counsel representing the Jammu and Kashmir Bar Association challenging the Centre's decision to revoke Article 370 told the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

A five-judge bench headed by Justice N.V. Ramana and comprising Justices S.K. Kaul, R. Subhash Reddy, B.R. Gavai and Surya Kant is hearing the pleas challenging the revocation of Article 370 which granted special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Appearing for the J&K Bar Association, senior advocate Zafar Ahmed Shah contended before the bench that the story of his state is different from others, and urged the court to examine the basis of Article 370 of the Constitution.

"The court must look at why this article was ever enforced," contended Shah.

He emphasised on three key aspects when a state accedes -- Instrument of Accession, Stand Still Agreement and the Merger Agreement. Jammu and Kashmir did not sign the Stand Still or the Merger agreement, and as a consequence it remained independent.

Shah insisted that a separate Constitution gave the state all the powers of governance, as there was never complete accession of the state, and the independent state never ceased to exist. "The whole Constitution cannot be made applicable to the region," he contended before the top court.

Shah told the court that the governance should continue to vest in the people of the region of J&K. "Council of ministers should agree (on the aspect of governance) and not Governor. Article 370 subsumes the sovereignty of the state. You have your Constitution and we have our Constitution. The merger was never done, but only accession was made," Shah submitted before the court.

He emphasised that both the Constitutions have been working hand in hand, and through Sub-clause (2) of Article 370, there would be no conflict between the Constitution of J&K and the Indian Constitution.

Attorney General K.K. Venugopal and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta raised objection when Shah contended that the revocation of Article 370 was a constitutional fraud.

He added that all other state rulers had fully integrated into the Indian Dominion except Kashmir. The arguments on the matter will continue on Thursday.

--IANS ss/arm

( 379 Words)

2020-01-22-20:54:58 (IANS)

 
  LATEST COMMENTS ()
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments Not Available
 
POST YOUR COMMENT
 
 
TRENDING TOPICS
 
 
CITY NEWS
MORE CITIES
 
 
INDIA WORLD ASIA
Delhi reports 93 new COVID-19 positive c...
IT Dept directed to release tax refunds ...
3 Bangladeshi infiltrators arrested in B...
Telangana issues guidelines for body dis...
Odisha's Ganjam district to conduct door...
South Central Railways converts coaches ...
More...    
 
 Top Stories
Man assaults 2 female doctors of Sa... 
Not just India, Jamaat a super spre... 
'Don't politicize this virus': Tedr... 
Gujarat to provide free ration to 6... 
Deeply concerned about safety of Si... 
South Central Railways converts coa... 
Models project 61,000 COVID-19 deat... 
Over 800 people stranded in virus-h...