Saturday, October 19, 2019
News

US SC blocks implementation of Louisiana abortion law

   SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend    Print this Page   COMMENT

Washington | Friday, 2019 11:15:11 PM IST
The US Supreme Court has blocked the implementation of a restrictive abortion law in the state of Louisiana in a 5-4 ruling.

In the 5-4 ruling issued late Thursday, Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court's liberal wing to stay the Unsafe Abortion Protection Act, which requires physicians to hold "active admitting privileges" at a hospital within 30 miles of the facility where abortion care is provided, the Hill newspaper reported.

Women's groups argue that the law has no medical justification and would restrict abortion. Abortion rights advocates welcomed the court's order, only hours before the law was to go into effect.

"The Supreme Court has stepped in under the wire to protect the rights of Louisiana women," Nancy Northup, the President of the Centre for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement cited by the New York Times.

Around 10,000 women seek abortions in Louisiana every year, and, according to them, if the law came into force it will allow only one physician to carry out abortions in the state legally.

President Donald Trump's two Supreme Court appointees, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, were among the four conservative members of the court who voted in favour of the law's implementation, according to Efe news.

Thursday's decision on abortion was the first one by the Supreme Court on the hot-button issue since the controversial confirmation of Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Kavanaugh had voted with the conservatives and filed a dissent where he said he would have allowed the law to come to force in the state to ascertain if it adversely affected women's access to abortion.

The Thursday ruling disappointed pro-life groups, who want the Supreme Court to reverse the abortion law, which was legalized in 1973.

The top court had ruled a similar Texas law to be unconstitutional in 2016. In the 2016 decision, five justices - one conservative - had declared it unconstitutional as it was found to offer no benefits to women's health while restricting women's right to seek abortion.

In the last few years, several conservative states have imposed restrictions on abortions, citing religious rights or women's health.

--IANS soni/bg

( 364 Words)

2019-02-08-19:48:08 (IANS)

 
  LATEST COMMENTS ()
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments Not Available
 
POST YOUR COMMENT
 
 
TRENDING TOPICS
 
 
CITY NEWS
MORE CITIES
 
 
 
MORE HEALTH NEWS
Study identifies compound effective agai...
Overthinking on trauma makes kids prone ...
Drinking tea may improve brain health, s...
Eating potato as effective as carbohydra...
J&J recalls 33K baby powder bottles in U...
Study discovers enzyme that may prevent ...
More...
 
INDIA WORLD ASIA
Maha polls: Income Tax dept seizes Rs 29...
West Bengal: BSF lodges FIR against BGB ...
Potato effective for boosting athletic p...
PMC Bank scam: Depositors stage protest ...
Haryana: Police yet to nab accused who b...
Evolve policy for those who do not have ...
More...    
 
 Top Stories
Pakistan hopes to come out of FATF... 
Dr. Zeus slams ‘Bala’ makers fo... 
Billboard featuring woman hog-tying... 
Goa govt signs 17 MoUs during the V... 
Karnataka Information Commission's ... 
West Bengal: BSF lodges FIR against... 
Campaigning ends in Maharashtra, Ha... 
AP govt saves over Rs 62 cr in Veli...