Home Site Map Make Your Home Page Suggestions Enquiry Advertise With Us
Thursday, February 09, 2012  
 
 
Press Releases
Features
Events
Special Articles
News Home
   
  News Updated on Thursday, February 09, 2012 12:05:54 PM
» India » Asia » World » Sports » Business » Sci-Tec » Health » Entertainment » Have your say » Picture Gallery
Top Stories
  India
  Asia
  World
  Sports
  Business
  Sci-Tec
  Health
  Entertainment
 
 India

Quit India Movement was a failure: RSS chief
Varanasi | October 15, 2006 10:51:08 PM IST
 

 

 

Quoting second Sarsanghchalak Guru Golwalkar, RSS chief K C Sudarshan today claimed the Quit India Movement launched by Congress in 1942 was a "failure" and the country became free only when the British were faced with a prospective rebellion by Air Force and Navy in 1946.

Addressing a 'Virat Hindu Sangam' here this evening, Mr Sudarshan, quoting Guru Golwalkar, said the "much touted" Quit India Movement of Congress in 1942 was a failure, as it did not have the support of the entire political mainstream waging a war against the British rule.

''The entire movement lost its steam as all its integral leaders were either arrested or went underground,'' Mr Sudarshan maintained.

Despite being not taken into confidence before launching the Movement, the RSS volunteers not only gave shelter to Congress workers hiding from British police, but lawyer's, owing allegiance to the songh, also contested the the cause of jailed Congress workers in court.

''Even Aruna Asaf Ali, one of the integral pillars of the 1942 movement in her musings on Quit India Movement acknowledged the role of an RSS office bearer from Delhi, Lala Hansraj, whose family provided her shelter during the time the police was searching for her,'' Mr Sudarshan claimed.

The RSS chief further criticised the Congress for claiming the sole credit of getting India free from British rule. It was the INA of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, which was responsible for the country's Independence he asserted.

Clement Attlee, the British Prime Minister at the time India became independent, during his 1956 visit to India, had conceded that it was not due to non-violent struggle of Congress, but the left over of Netaji's armed struggle which clinched freedom for India, Mr Sudarshan claimed.

''Mr Attlee had said in 1956 that when INA volunteers captured by British Army were being tried in 1946, there was rebellion like circumstances in Navy at Bombay and Air Force in New Delhi. Fearing a prospective coup by armed forces, the Britis granted independence to India, but only after actualising their 1880s dream of partioning the undivided country,'' Mr Sudarshan maintained.

UNI ARS VD RN2155

 
  Viewer's Comment
Comments Not Available
 
 More Stories

Egypt PM says \'country\'s military to remain in power until June 30\' 

Human Rights Watch says Saleh\'s forces killed 270 across Yemen in Arab Spring protest 

Deepika Padukone beats Katrina Kaif to be Rajnikanth\'s new heroine 

Ayesha Takia plans to take legal action against Kingfisher Airlines 

Rooney backs Redknapp for England job 

Capello resigns over FA decision to strip Terry of England captaincy 

Human Rights Watch urges US to pressure Pak govt to stop Balochistan violence 

Maldives ex-president\'s family in Sri Lanka 


Print this Page
Printer Friendly Version
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Search Archives :  



Quick Links - Webindia123.com
Services
Health
Hobbies
Entertainment
Classifieds
Career / Education
UK, USA, Canada
Utilities
E-Booking
India Reference
 
 
 
 
 
Personalities
 
 
 
 
IndianStates
Punjab
 
Rajasthan
 
Sikkim
 
  
Tripura
 
 
 
 
Pondicherry

Copyright 2000-2012 Suni Systems (P) Ltd.
All rights reserved