Home Site Map Make Your Home Page Suggestions Enquiry Advertise With Us
Saturday, August 09, 2008  
 
 
Press Releases
Features
Events
Special Articles
News Home
   
  News Updated on Saturday, August 09, 2008 12:43:33 AM
Top Stories
  India
  Asia
  World
  Sports
  Business
  Sci-Tec
  Health
  Entertainment
 
 World

"30 pc of US aid siphons off as 'overhead expenses' before reaching Pak, Afghanistan"
Washington | May 17, 2008 3:16:15 PM IST
 

Nearly 30 per cent of the US' aid for Afghanistan and Pakistan is siphoned off as "overhead expenses", in the form of consulting fee and other costs, before it reaches the region, said US Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher during a recent hearing of the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia.

He said that since the two countries had received billions of dollars in aid since 9/11, the overhead expenses run into hundreds of millions of dollars.

"I think that on the high end, it might touch 30 per cent. For some of the not-for-profits, their overhead is going to be much closer to, say, 10 per cent," the Dawn quoted Boucher as saying at the hearing.

The issue came up for discussion when Panel chairman Congressman Gary Ackerman asked Boucher and another witness: "How much of the funds are we talking about that were skimmed in the United States before it ever got to Afghanistan or Pakistan or anywhere else?"

Mark Ward, a senior administrator at the US Agency for International Development, told the lawmaker that "these are costs that the US government was well aware of before it entered into these contracts and grants."

Last week, former US ambassadors Richard Holbrooke and Thomas Pickering told the House Committee on Foreign Affairs that large sums from US assistant to a foreign nation went on consulting fees and overhead costs. They noted that much of the 750 million dollars earmarked for the tribal areas will never leave the US soil.

Ward, however, assured the panel that the administration was now making a serious effort to cut costs by hiring local contractors. "It's strange that it's taken us all this time and billions of dollars to figure out that the money to be spent on the ground should be spent on the ground," Ackerman retorted.

Citing an example, he said contract for hiring screeners at airports for Homeland Security, was sub-contracted three times at a cut of 20 per cent each. Consequently, the actual people doing the work received just 40 per cent of the total amount.

Ackerman also objected to the practice of involving US contractors for designing earthquake-proof schools in the areas destroyed by the 2005 earthquake in Pakistan. About this, Ward told the Congressman that although a Pakistani firm was building these schools, one of the top engineering firms in the United States was supporting the construction. (ANI)

 More Stories

Unemployment to be solved through SEZs alone: AP CM 

Congress gives whip to legislators for voting in budget session 

Fiona postpones her visit to Goa 

JMM leader shot at in Steel City 

3rd, Test of Border-Gavaskar trophy to start on Oct 29 

Surjeet remembered 

No sale of land to outsiders like in HP and Uttaranchal: BJP 

Shiv Sena rubbishes reports on Naxal links 


Print this Page
Printer Friendly Version
E-Mail this page to a Friend
Send This page to A Friend

Search Archives :  



Quick Links - Webindia123.com
Services
Hobbies
 
Entertainment
Classifieds
Career / Education
UK, USA, Canada
Utilities
E-Booking
India Reference
 
IndianStates
Pradesh

Copyright 2000-2008 Suni Systems (P) Ltd.
All rights reserved