Home Site Map Make Your Home Page Suggestions Enquiry Advertise With Us
Friday, February 10, 2012  
 
 
News Home
Video News
Press Releases
Features
Events
Special Articles
   
  News Updated on Friday, February 10, 2012 4:51:55 PM
   Find Us on Facebook    Follow Us
» India » Asia » World » Sports » Business » Sci-Tec » Health » Entertainment » Bollywood » Picture Gallery
 
 India

CEC 'ex-parte' recommendations contrary to SC, AP HC orders: OMC
Hyderabad | Saturday, Nov 21 2009 IST
 

 

 

A day after the Supreme Court-appointed Central Empowered Committee (CEC) submitted its recommendations on the Obulapuram Mining Company (OMC) controversy, the company today alleged that its ''ex-parte'' findings were contrary to the orders of the apex court and the Andhra Pradesh High Court.

In a rejoinder here tonight, OMC Managing Director B V Srinivas Reddy charged the CEC with ''not giving any notice to it'' before submitting its findings which were ''beyond its jurisdiction'', faulting it for publishing its findings even as the case was sub judice and pending before the apex court.

Seeking to clarify the alleged ''distorted versions'', Mr Reddy said ''We are very much pained to read the distorted version of certain issues relating to our Company as well as former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Y S Rajasekhar Reddy.'' ''The report of CEC is contrary to the judgments of the Andhra Pradesh High Court and even of the Supreme Court order passed on August 24, 2009,'' he said. ''The Report of CEC dated November 19, 2009 is without jurisdiction since the Supreme Court never directed CEC to submit such report,'' he said. ''The report of the CEC is an ex parte report since Obulapuram Mining Company was never heard before making such a report''.

''The report is purported to be pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court, which does not direct or authorises CEC to submit such report''.

Mr Reddy contended that ''at the outset, on a plain reading of the observations and recommendations of Central Empowered Committee makes it abundantly clear that it has not dealt with any issues relating to environment''.

''There is no green issue involved. The boundary dispute between two private companies is not concern of Central Empowered Committee''.

''The boundary dispute is already adjudicated by the High Court. This judgment has become final, since no party has preferred any appeal against the same.

-- (UNI) -- 21DR101.xml

 
  Viewer's Comment
Comments Not Available
 
 More Stories

China sacks four officials in Tibet for endangering stability 

Ahsan confirms Gilani will appear before Pak SC on Feb 13 to face indictment over contempt charges 

Nine men jailed for London Stock Exchange bomb plot 

Marines posed for photo with Nazi SS symbol in Afghanistan 

Google manufacturing home entertainment device 

Obama administration urged to deploy tactics to kill Taliban leaders like al Qaeda 

Army chief withdraws case against Govt. in Supreme Court on age row (Update) 

How brain differentiates between left and right 


Print this Page
Printer Friendly Version
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Search Archives :  



Quick Links - Webindia123.com
Services
Health
Hobbies
Entertainment
Classifieds
Career / Education
UK, USA, Canada
Utilities
E-Booking
India Reference
 
 
 
 
 
Personalities
 
 
 
 
IndianStates
Punjab
 
Rajasthan
 
Sikkim
 
  
Tripura
 
 
 
 
Pondicherry

Copyright 2000-2012 Suni Systems (P) Ltd.
All rights reserved