Home Site Map Make Your Home Page Suggestions Enquiry Advertise With Us
Wednesday, February 08, 2012  
 
 
Press Releases
Features
Events
Special Articles
News Home
   
  News Updated on Wednesday, February 08, 2012 8:16:43 PM
» India » Asia » World » Sports » Business » Sci-Tec » Health » Entertainment » Have your say » Picture Gallery
Top Stories
  India
  Asia
  World
  Sports
  Business
  Sci-Tec
  Health
  Entertainment
 
 India

Quit India Movement was a failure: RSS chief
Varanasi | October 15, 2006 10:51:08 PM IST
 

 

 

Quoting second Sarsanghchalak Guru Golwalkar, RSS chief K C Sudarshan today claimed the Quit India Movement launched by Congress in 1942 was a "failure" and the country became free only when the British were faced with a prospective rebellion by Air Force and Navy in 1946.

Addressing a 'Virat Hindu Sangam' here this evening, Mr Sudarshan, quoting Guru Golwalkar, said the "much touted" Quit India Movement of Congress in 1942 was a failure, as it did not have the support of the entire political mainstream waging a war against the British rule.

''The entire movement lost its steam as all its integral leaders were either arrested or went underground,'' Mr Sudarshan maintained.

Despite being not taken into confidence before launching the Movement, the RSS volunteers not only gave shelter to Congress workers hiding from British police, but lawyer's, owing allegiance to the songh, also contested the the cause of jailed Congress workers in court.

''Even Aruna Asaf Ali, one of the integral pillars of the 1942 movement in her musings on Quit India Movement acknowledged the role of an RSS office bearer from Delhi, Lala Hansraj, whose family provided her shelter during the time the police was searching for her,'' Mr Sudarshan claimed.

The RSS chief further criticised the Congress for claiming the sole credit of getting India free from British rule. It was the INA of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, which was responsible for the country's Independence he asserted.

Clement Attlee, the British Prime Minister at the time India became independent, during his 1956 visit to India, had conceded that it was not due to non-violent struggle of Congress, but the left over of Netaji's armed struggle which clinched freedom for India, Mr Sudarshan claimed.

''Mr Attlee had said in 1956 that when INA volunteers captured by British Army were being tried in 1946, there was rebellion like circumstances in Navy at Bombay and Air Force in New Delhi. Fearing a prospective coup by armed forces, the Britis granted independence to India, but only after actualising their 1880s dream of partioning the undivided country,'' Mr Sudarshan maintained.

UNI ARS VD RN2155

 
  Viewer's Comment
Comments Not Available
 
 More Stories

\'26/11 Mumbai incident changed India\'s security matrix\': Antony 

Mauritius ready to review bilateral tax treaty with India: Ramgoolam 

After pornography exposure Congress says BJP corrupt and shameless party 

Elizabeth Taylor\'s art auctioned for $22m 

Button \'up\' and \'ready\' for Raikkonen challenge 

Joan Rivers was \'kidding\' about 739 plastic surgeries 

\'Determined\' De Gea wants to emulate legendary Man U goalie Schmeichel 

Ex-Maldives president now claims he \'was forced to resign at gunpoint\' 


Print this Page
Printer Friendly Version
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Search Archives :  



Quick Links - Webindia123.com
Services
Health
Hobbies
Entertainment
Classifieds
Career / Education
UK, USA, Canada
Utilities
E-Booking
India Reference
 
 
 
 
 
Personalities
 
 
 
 
IndianStates
Punjab
 
Rajasthan
 
Sikkim
 
  
Tripura
 
 
 
 
Pondicherry

Copyright 2000-2012 Suni Systems (P) Ltd.
All rights reserved